Today, I woke up to a profound sense of disappointment and confusion following the United States presidential election results. It is difficult to process the reality that a person with a well-documented history of racism, misogyny, and a blatant disregard for the pillars of democracy—someone who has incited violence, faced numerous indictments for election interference, attempted to undermine the electoral process, falsified documents, committed fraud, and accrued a staggering 34 felony convictions—has been chosen to lead this nation. How can we reconcile this decision, especially when it represents the voice of so many Americans, some of whom are my neighbors, colleagues, and friends? People who know who he is, what he’s done, and yet cast their ballots in his favor.

This outcome raises questions that go beyond politics. What does it mean about our collective values as a nation? As a society, we often hold individuals accountable for their misdeeds, condemning those with felony convictions to a lifetime of exclusion and punishment, even after they’ve served their time. For these individuals, there is no grace, no opportunity to prove they can be better. They face a wall of over 40,000 collateral consequences that prevent them from fully reentering society, building better lives, and contributing to their communities. Yet here, we have granted grace to someone who has repeatedly shown disdain for the rule of law and respect for others.

For those of us impacted by the justice system, who know firsthand the challenges of trying to overcome mistakes and rebuild lives, this election feels like a slap in the face. It is disheartening to see a nation willing to overlook serious transgressions at the highest levels while punishing everyday people for far less. This double standard not only reveals a painful inconsistency in how we value accountability but also perpetuates a message that some are simply above the law.

It’s a call for reflection on the character of our country. Are we, as Americans, content to accept leaders who defy the very standards we hold ordinary citizens to? This moment challenges us to reconsider our sense of justice, equity, and compassion. If we are to move forward as a unified nation, we must reckon with the ways in which our choices contradict our stated values.

My hope is that we use this moment to examine not just our political divisions but the underlying principles we claim to uphold as a society. For a truly just and compassionate future, we must demand more of ourselves—and more of those we choose to lead us.

    In Solidarity, 

​




   
    Pamela Winn
    President & Founding Director 
    RestoreHER US.America

In the heart of the United States, a nation that prides itself as the bastion of democracy and freedom, a paradox unfolds. Here, in this "land of the free," where individuals risk everything for a promise of liberty, the shadows of oversight extend even into the sanctum of our democratic rights—our right to vote. Georgia stands as a poignant example of this contradiction, participating in the Electronic Registration Information System (ERIC), a multistate information-sharing initiative designed to police voter registrations by identifying voters who have moved or passed away. This system, however, is just the tip of the iceberg in a series of measures that seemingly aim to safeguard electoral integrity but, in reality, serve as mechanisms of voter suppression. 

Brad Raffensperger, Georgia's Secretary of State, recently announced plans to cancel 191,000 "inactive" voter registrations with thousands more already canceled, praising Georgia's voter rolls as the "cleanest in the nation." This act is not isolated; it follows a history of purging that saw a record 534,000 registrations canceled in 2017. While the intent is proclaimed to be the preservation of electoral integrity, one cannot help but see the underlying currents of disenfranchisement, particularly against the most vulnerable populations, including the formerly incarcerated. 
In Georgia, those with a completed felony sentence, meaning they are no longer on probation or parole, regain their right to vote. This distinction importantly includes those who still owe fines, fees, or restitution. Moreover, individuals incarcerated but not convicted of a felony are also eligible to vote. Despite these allowances, the reality is starkly different for formerly incarcerated individuals, who face disproportionate challenges, such as homelessness and housing instability—issues that significantly increase their likelihood of being categorized as "inactive" voters and thus, susceptible to being purged from voter rolls.

The narrative of disenfranchisement is personal to many, including myself, a former homeowner turned homeless after serving a 78-month federal sentence for a white-collar crime. My journey, marked by constant relocation due to housing discrimination, underscores a critical flaw in the system: being marked inactive and subsequently purged from voter rolls does not equate to a lack of interest or intent to participate in the democratic process. It is a byproduct of systemic barriers that unjustly silence voices.

In response to these challenges, organizations like RestoreHER US.America have taken significant steps to empower and educate the formerly incarcerated about their voting rights, while also working to reform the system. Initiatives like SB105, which potentially shortens probation periods and thereby reinstates voting eligibility sooner, alongside educational efforts through the IMPPACT program, aim to combat voter suppression and reinvigorate democratic participation among marginalized communities.

Yet, the question remains: Why should the act of registration, a declaration of one's intent to participate in democracy, be subject to cancellation based on turnout or personal circumstances that prevent engagement in every electoral cycle? The essence of democracy is not just the act of voting but the right to vote—the assurance that one's voice can be heard when they choose to speak.

As we reflect on the state of our democracy, it becomes clear that the true measure of our nation's commitment to freedom and justice is not in the cleanliness of our voter rolls, but in the inclusivity of our electoral process. The efforts to police the vote, under the guise of maintaining electoral integrity, reveal a disconcerting willingness to sacrifice the democratic principles of accessibility and equality for administrative convenience.

The path forward must involve a reevaluation of our priorities, shifting focus from policing the vote to empowering it. Policies and practices that disproportionately impact the most vulnerable, disenfranchising them either directly or through the creation of insurmountable barriers, must be critically examined and reformed. Our democracy is only as strong as the voices it includes, and it is time we ensure that every voice, especially those that have been silenced or marginalized, is heard.
In this endeavor, we are called not only to challenge the systems in place but to advocate for a more inclusive, equitable, and just democratic process. This is the essence of the American promise—the true realization of a land where freedom and democracy are not just ideals, but realities for all.

In Solidarity,

Pamela Winn, President & Founding Director, RestoreHER US.America

Women are the givers of life, a role that should hold them in the highest regard. Yet, in a nation entrenched in patriarchy and classism, women have historically experienced subordination that has led them to believe in the normative of a life suppressed in silence, meekness, and domestication. This systemic oppression has been pervasive, affecting every aspect of women's lives, including those who find themselves entangled in the criminal legal system. Justice impacted women—those who have been arrested, incarcerated, or otherwise involved in the criminal legal system—are among the most marginalized and overlooked groups in the fight for gender equality.

On August 26th, we observe National Women’s Equality Day. In recent decades, women have increasingly taken up the mantle of addressing inequality, combating issues such as domestic and sexual violence, wage disparity, lack of access to education, inadequate healthcare, and the right to vote. Through tireless campaigning, legal battles, and mass mobilizations, women have sought to change laws, shift societal norms, and demand that their rights be respected and protected. However, despite these efforts, justice impacted women continue to be overlooked, excluded from broader conversations about gender equality, and subjected to a criminal legal system designed primarily with men in mind.

Over 80% of justice impacted women are primary caregivers and mothers. These women are often criminalized for their lived experiences, which include domestic violence, sexual abuse, and poverty—circumstances that are frequently beyond their control. For example, many women who are incarcerated have been victims of domestic violence, and their criminal charges often stem from acts of survival, such as defending themselves against an abuser. Yet, instead of receiving the support and protection they need, these women are funneled into a punitive system that criminalizes their response to trauma.

The impact of this criminalization is profound. Approximately one million justice impacted women are disenfranchised, stripped of their right to vote and participate in the democratic process. This disenfranchisement extends beyond the walls of prisons and jails; it is a lifelong punishment that serves to silence and marginalize women who already face significant barriers to equality.

Incarcerated women face numerous indignities and human rights violations, often rooted in the fact that the criminal legal system was not designed with their needs in mind. For example, incarcerated women are frequently provided with men’s clothing, recycled underwear, and a lack of feminine hygiene products. Gender-specific programming is often non-existent, and access to necessary gynecological care is limited, if not outright denied. In some cases, women are subjected to unwanted medical procedures, further stripping them of their autonomy and bodily integrity.

The situation is even more dire for pregnant women in prison. These women are often deprived of access to abortion, proper nutrition, and adequate perinatal or postpartum care. They may be forced to endure induced labor without adequate support, and after giving birth, they are typically allowed only two hours with their newborns before the child is taken away. In a cruel twist of fate, these mothers are then given just 24 hours to select a caregiver to pick up their babies, or they risk losing their parental rights altogether.

These injustices reflect a broader societal assumption that justice impacted women have no rights, or at least no rights worth protecting. Yet, the reality is that these women share the same plight for equality as any other woman. They are mothers, daughters, sisters, and friends who deserve to be treated with dignity and respect, regardless of their involvement with the criminal legal system.

The fight for women’s equality cannot be fully realized until we address the unique challenges faced by justice impacted women. This requires a fundamental shift in how we view and treat women within the criminal legal system. Instead of criminalizing their survival strategies, we must provide them with the support and resources they need to heal from trauma and rebuild their lives. This includes access to mental health services, educational and vocational training, and reentry programs that are designed specifically for women.

Moreover, we must challenge the systemic injustices that disproportionately impact women of color, poor women, and LGBTQ+ women within the criminal legal system. These women are often doubly marginalized, facing discrimination not only because of their gender but also because of their race, socioeconomic status, or sexual orientation. By centering the experiences of the most vulnerable women in our advocacy efforts, we can begin to dismantle the oppressive structures that perpetuate inequality and create a more just and equitable society for all.

Justice impacted women are not voiceless; their voices have been silenced by a system that refuses to listen. RestoreHER US.America is a voice for justice impacted women, fighting for their dignity, reproductive rights, safety, and equality. It is time for society to recognize the humanity of these women and to acknowledge their right to equality, both inside and outside the criminal legal system. Only then can we begin to create a world where all women are truly free and equal.

~Pamela Winn, Founding Director, RestoreHER

The fabric of society is woven by various unique threads, each integral to the overall strength and resilience of the community. Among these, women hold a distinct place, carrying the profound capability of motherhood. This ability is not just a biological function but a cornerstone for the future of humanity. Yet, in our society, there are environments where the sanctity and vulnerabilities associated with motherhood are not only ignored but are blatantly violated. This is especially true for incarcerated women, who face conditions that starkly contradict any society that claims to value life and motherhood.
 
The United States stands at a critical juncture regarding women’s health, particularly maternal and infant health. As it stands, maternal and infant mortality rates are alarmingly high, an issue that extends into the lives of incarcerated women, whose plight remains largely invisible. When a woman enters the penal system, she does not forfeit her human rights, nor does she relinquish the rights of the unborn child she may be carrying. Yet, the treatment of pregnant women in prisons starkly reflects a society that has turned its back on its most vulnerable.
 
Incarcerated pregnant women face unimaginable hardships. Chains are often wrapped around their bellies, applying unnecessary pressure on the fetus. The nutritional needs of pregnant women are grossly unmet, with meals that are not only nutritionally inadequate but sometimes expired. The environment of incarceration—hard iron beds, flat mats, or even floors—is far from conducive to a healthy pregnancy.
 
Perhaps more harrowing is the medical neglect these women face. Without adequate prenatal care, complications that could otherwise be managed become life-threatening. Postpartum care is also woefully inadequate, leaving women to face the aftermath of childbirth alone and unsupported. This can result in severe physical and psychological consequences. Furthermore, it’s not uncommon for these women to be left in solitary confinement to give birth alone without medical assistance, a situation that can lead to devastating outcomes, including the loss of the baby.
 
The issue extends beyond individual neglect to a systemic failure. Although laws such as the Dignity for Incarcerated Women’s Act as well as the Women’s CARE Act (aiming to defer sentences for pregnant women until 12 weeks postpartum) have been passed, the implementation is spotty and inadequate. This Act is a critical step toward addressing these issues as it not only provides a window for necessary perinatal care but also ensures that mothers and babies have essential bonding time which is vital for the infant's development.
 
However, the systemic issues in our penal institutions, which are fundamentally not designed to accommodate pregnant women, continue to perpetuate these atrocities. The situation reflects a broader societal contradiction—while states increasingly legislate on matters of reproductive rights and claim to protect unborn lives, the reality for many pregnant women in prison tells a different story. This dichotomy highlights a glaring gap between proclaimed values and actual practices.
 
Moreover, as the country grapples with a maternal-infant mortality crisis, the experiences of incarcerated pregnant women remain underreported and are often excluded from the data, rendering them invisible. This omission is not just a gap in data but a significant barrier to understanding and addressing the scope of the issue.
 
It is time for a comprehensive reevaluation of how we treat incarcerated women, especially those who are pregnant. If we are to truly uphold the values of life and motherhood we so fervently claim to cherish, actions must align with words. Passing and implementing the Women’s CARE Act is not just a matter of legal reform; it is a moral imperative. We must ensure that all mothers, irrespective of their circumstances, have access to the care and dignity they deserve. This is not merely a policy issue—it is a profound moral and ethical obligation that speaks to the very essence of who we are as a society.
 
In a nation that prides itself on justice and human rights, the conditions and treatment of pregnant women in prisons should be an outrage to us all. It’s a poignant reminder that in the quest for justice and equality, the path is long and arduous, but also that every step taken towards empathy and reform is a step towards a more humane society. Let this not just be a legislative priority, but a national reflection on our values and our commitment to upholding the dignity of every life. #EndPrisonBirth